Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Is human life cheaper than that of Dogs?
With due respect to the Animal Lovers, and the BSPCA, the news appearing for the last few days about the Dog Lover keeping the stray dogs confined in her home in spite of Society's objection. You don't need an army of dogs to take care of her aged mother. Her claim that " officials of different department keep coming at odd hours" does not carry any weight , unless the Member and the old lady are involved in some commercial/or other activity from the premises besides residential. They should discuss the mater and arrive at a workable solution.
As per the news, the Member has tried to convert her house as a shelter for Stray dogs in a residential area, at the risk and cost of endangering the life of the neighbours and children around exposing them to danger of rabies and can be legally expelled from the Society besides a criminal charges for her vicarious involvement.
If the Member is still adamant, the Society with the help of BSPCA should pursue the matter legally against concerned Member , after ascertaining whether the concerned Member has taken the relevant permission for keeping the stray dogs and whether the Municipal Authorities have permitted her to convert the flat as a Dog Kennel/shelter, with the Society's N.O.C.
We should show love and affection towards the Animals, but certainly not at the risk and cost of human lives and especially when it affects and interferes with others' normal life and their rights. Providing her with legal assistance for defending a violation is against equity and justice and patently violates the right to normal life of other human beings ..
6 Answers
- Anonymous10 years agoFavourite answer
I agree, people are saying its "animal abuse" because a women would pick her child over her dog. Well i would HOPE so!!!!
If i had to pick between feeding my baby and my dog, sorry that baby would sure as heck come first! I think people who help animals are great, but there ARE boundaries. And people need to learn to respect that.
Now watch 10 million people yell at me because of my opinion calling me a "animal abuser." Just watch..
- 10 years ago
I didn't fully understand the situation but you are talking about, to answer your question, I think my dogs are waay more important than other people or their kids . Sorry I know that sounds bad but if my dog and someone's kid were both drowning in a freezing lake then I would jump in after my dog to save him. If I wasn't dead from hypothermia afterwards then I would go back for the child. However I recently inherited 2 girls whom I see as my children. If one of them was drowning then I would get them 1st hands down. I would figure the dog can wait cause my babies are in danger.
Why should I lose a loved one so another person's loved one can live? My dogs come before people I don't know. Their lives don't affect mine so I don't care about them. Sorry.My family and friends come before my dogs no doubt about it.
- Anonymous10 years ago
Being the sociopath that I am, I'd pick my dog over 95-99% of the people in the world. I have my limits but as far as people I don't know or care about, my dog comes over them.
Proceed to TD please.
- Anonymous10 years ago
Humans over animal, always, enough said. Hope I helped.
Source(s): Realist