Do you want to believe a normal man who did not witness evolution or the bible whose origins are not known?

the fact that both happened is pretty clear to me

Paz de Cristo

The origin of the Bible is know. In the 4th century AD Alexander the Great had a scribe of his collect all the scrolls out there written by the apostles and others. The scribe went through them and took the ones he believed were the most correct of the word of God and Jesus as well as the books from the Torah (old testament) and compiled the Bible. He did leave books out and if a scroll had been damaged and he could not read it all he also left those out. He also left out other writing that were written long after Christs Crucifixion.

Now that does not mean that the Bible is a work of man, but that a man compiled the various scrolls in to a book (the Bible) I believe under the inspiration of God.

This man also decided the order of the books of the new testament as well as what was left out of it. So is the Bible to COMPLETE word of God? No, but it is one of the best sources that we have.

Proof of evolution is everywhere you look. Proof of creation is non-existent. One involves empirical evidence and the other involves faith. Stop trying to make faith a matter of science; it only makes you appear desperate.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6896753.stm

How about these guys that observed evolution in action? Can I believe them? Because I do.

normal man. duh. men wrote the bible