May I request your opinion on the following suggestions?

Odampully,

We have hardly any ideological differences. It is only the way of expressing our views in which I differ with you. I had written to you earlier also that theists are hurt by your writings and the way you present your question. But instead of accepting it, you are always arguing as to why they should be hurt. You use derogatory words for God and try to explain that He does not exist and hence it makes no difference. When a person dies, what remains is a dead body which scientifically is no longer that person, but all people take out the funeral procession respectfully. Do we cut the body into pieces and carry in a suitcase and destroy in any way? We salute the national flag which is just a piece of cloth. There have been controversies about some celebrities having insulted the national flag. Sania Mirza was shown placing hers legs towards national flag and Sachin Tendulkar was shown cutting a cake with national flag drawn on it which created a lot of uproar. Why? I and you ma

may think that making an issue out of it is unjustified, but the main thing is that the national flag is a symbol of our independence and it hurts the feelings of the people if not handled properly. These are some traditions which are related to people's faith in some way of respecting different things. Even the President salutes a national parade on republic day. Scientifically, it may seem meaningless, but in life there is place for many other things besides science. As far as some harmful superstitions is concerned, I am fully agreeable with you that they should be curbed by the government with a heavy hand and the people should be awakened against such practices. Recently, there is a controversy of how Nirmalbaba cheating people in the name of "Kripa" and the "Third eye". It is necessary to tacke such people who make money cheating people in the name of God. There is no need to insist on theists to give up believing in God as long as it is not harmful to the

harmful to them or to others. The words "vague, sentimental and devoid of facts" were used by your friend in response to your question in which you had posted what I had stated. Pity is that whatever I had stated was exactly the same as what you friend stated. He had misunderstood your question and criticized me.

You had made a series of mistakes in posting question after question about me. Your question about bringing up children in non-religious atmosphere was answered by me stating that my son and cousin were brought up in such an atmosphere and still they believed in God and religion. Next day only, you posted a question quoting your friend stating that my answer is vague, sentimental and not based on facts without giving link of your question where he had stated so. I was disturbed thing as if my statements about my son and cousin were considered lacking facts which amounted to saying that I am telling a lie. I even drew your attention to that. It was only after that yo

It was only after that you gave the link of the question. Then again, on opening that link, I did not find any comments of your friend about me in that. Then you floated a new question in which I found the comments he had stated and that too he had misunderstood your question. What is the authenticity of such persons who either don't know language or hurriedly read, misinterpret and make statements. My views about temple construction matched exactly with his and he considered my views as vague. In fact, my statement that there are thousands of temples in India and millions are homeless was to support your view and your friend's view. But he misunderstood as if I am trying to say that when there are thousands of temples, what is the harm in one more. That was not what I had stated.

You stated that you never like to hurt anyone's feelings. But float a question if you have done so or not. That will clarify if you are right or not. If I float such a question and even if there

Making the network private does not help anyone from others creating fake ids in his name. For that, only solution is for YA to disallow same ids by different persons. I also get confused bu that resulting in misunderstanding. In cricket section, there is one Indian who is unpopular especially amongst Australians. He was friendly with me. But one Australian created a fake id in his name and wrote something that was objectionable and I expressed my displeasure at that. Then, I got an email from the real person explaining that something was stated in his name and how I can identify him and not misunderstand.

(contd. from previous para)

You stated that you never like to hurt anyone's feelings. But float a question if you have done so or not. That will clarify if you are right or not. If I float such a question and even if there was one person telling me that I had hurt him, I shall apologize without arguing. I might say that I had no such intention, but even If he felt hurt unintentionally, I apologize.